George Ince

Product Information

A further complication turned on the fact that Davis might never have been committed for trial from the lower courts had blood test results been disclosed at the committal stage. The judge added that Ince had “yet to give any kind of account that could be said to be frank and open” about his offending but said it could be “borne out of a deep sense of shame”. In May 1976, despite a then-recent Court of Appeal decision (11 December 1975) not to overturn Davis's criminal conviction, the Home Secretary, Roy Jenkins, on partial completion of a police review of the case, agreed to recommend the release of Davis without further referral back to the Court of Appeal. Friend that it is clear from the article in The Guardian, as I read it, that whatever document The Guardian thinks it has seen, it is not the Sills report.

Many reports contain information which could certainly not be freely disclosed such as the names and addresses of witnesses or criminal records of named persons, as well as statements made to the police and facts disclosed in the course of investigation which may be prejudicial to named persons. Alternatively, he can recommend the exercise of the Royal Prerogative of Mercy if the evidence is not properly receivable by the court but is tested and undermines the conviction. Jenkins undertook this highly exceptional exercise of the Royal Prerogative of Mercy because of doubts over the evidence presented by the police which helped convict Davis. In a letter that the Home Secretary sent to me, however, he promised that if there were any fresh evidence he would look at it.While the barred list is open to the public to view, and employers to check, the advisory list is not - leaving potential employers potentially unaware of the allegations against the applicant. I assure him that this investigation will be carried out with diligence and that he will be made aware as soon as the result is received by the Home Office.

A former Norfolk police officer has been jailed after admitting indecent images offences of the “gravest” kind. Both campaigns had support from London political activists who had a history of organising radical defence campaigns around the criminal justice system. The item is exactly as described on the product page, it was delivered in a timely manner and was packaged securely for transit. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. It has been the subject of a complaint under Section 49 of the Police Act 1964, which was investigated, as my hon.I believe that it would be to the long-term detriment of people involved in these investigations if such reports were to be published.

The present Home Secretary, however, has done a total reversion, right back to before 1974, to a harder line—a very hard line indeed. Friend has been given a new twist by a report in The Guardian this morning purporting to give extracts from the Sills report.In particular, among these core activists (who had supported and helped organise "defence campaigns" in connection with The Angry Brigade arrests and criminal prosecutions) were a number who went on to establish Up Against The Law (UPAL), a London-based "political collective". George Davis (born 1941) [ citation needed] is an armed robber, born in Bletchley, [ citation needed] England and active in England.

Figures from 31 police forces obtained by RADAR under the Freedom of Information Act reveal at least 750 accusations were made against officers between 2016 and 2020. Even where there is a public inquiry it is often necessary to check with people who have given evidence as to whether they agree that the particular proposal should be published. When this campaign started 18 months ago I was completely on my own and, if the truth were known, I was probably being labelled as a well meaning nut case, even in East London with no friends at all that I could seriously talk to about Davis’s case… I value UPAL’S help a great deal … I thought that I must find other people and that if I make sacrifices then sooner or later others would join the fight….The appeal was heard "explicitly on the basis that (Davis) has no expectation of compensation or other recognition. These breaches are compromising the relationship police have with communities they most need to serve. The barred list as a whole is not published and it is not otherwise available for the public to view.