Intel Xeon, E5-2699v4, 2.20 GHz, LGA2011-3, 55 MB cache tray CPU

Product Information

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2699 v3. PCIe version Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2699 v3. Brutalizer - Wednesday, April 6, 2016 - link If we talk about how encryption affects performance, lets look at this benchmark below. Never mind the x86 is slower than the SPARC M7, let us instead look at how encryption affects the cpus. What performance hit has encryption?

I wanted to go 5800x because it was sort-of-kind-of close to the 2699 v4 on cinebench r15 multi, short by 1,000 points (which is kind of a lot I guess). It's cheaper though, the 5800x vs the 2699 v4. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2696 v4. PCIe versionIntel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html for details. It is not really interesting that this single SPARC M7 cpu is 30% faster than two E5-2699v3 in absolute numbers. No, we are looking at how much worse the performance gets affected when we turn on encryption. In case of x86, we see that the cpus gets twice the load, so they are almost fully loaded, only by turning on encryption. At the same time taking longer time to process the work. Ergo, you can not do any additional work with x86 with crypto. With SPARC, it ends up with 40% cpu utilization so you can do additional work on SPARC, and process time does not increase at all (2%). This proves that x86 encryption halves performance or worse. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2696 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Instruction set extensions For x86 we see that two E5-2699v3 cpus utilization goes from 40% without crypto, up to 80% with crypto. This leaves the x86 server with very little headroom to do anything else than executing one query. At the same time, the x86 server took 25-30% longer time to process the query. This shows that encryption has a huge impact on x86. You can not do useful work with two x86 cpus, except executing a query. If you need to do additional work, get four x86 xeons instead.

If we look at how SPARC M7 gets affected by encryption, we see that cpu utilization went up from 30% up to 40%. So you have lot of headroom to do additional work while processing the query. At the same time, the SPARC cpu took 2% longer time to process the query. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2696 v4 are enumerated here. VT-d How much should I pay for the 2699 v4? I primarily like to encode with Handbrake or MediaCoder but I do like to game a lot. Should I go Ryzen or go Xeon? Intel classifications are for general, educational and planning purposes only and consist of Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) and Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) numbers. Any use made of Intel classifications are without recourse to Intel and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty regarding the proper ECCN or HTS. Your company as an importer and/or exporter is responsible for determining the correct classification of your transaction. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2696 v4.See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/hyper-threading/hyper-threading-technology.html?wapkw=hyper+threading for more information including details on which processors support Intel® HT Technology. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Xeon E5-2699 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Instruction set extensions However it could not go on forever. Sooner or later Intel would need to slow down a bit on adding cores, for both power and space reasons, and today Intel has finally pumped the brakes a bit.