Reebok Unisex-Adult Nano X1 Cross Trainer

Product Information

Amanda, our fitness writer, runs with her dog 3 miles a few days a week. She decided to try the X1s out for mid-distance running and her verdict is that they aren’t the best choice for strictly cardio workouts. One of the biggest discrepancies between Nike Metcon and Reebok Nano models is their overall sizing and fit. Generally, the Nike Metcon models run slightly more slim while the Reebok Nanos have a slightly wider toe box. With the firm’s Floatride Energy Foam built in the forefoot, there’s an added bonus of cushioning when you need it. This is ideal for high-energy activities, such as sprinting but doesn’t ruin the firmness needed when it comes to more intense exercise. It’s this that makes the Nano X1 the most versatile shoe in the series yet. Overall, those are the biggest and most prevalent construction callouts that relate to performance for the Reebok Nano X1. Reebok Nano X Vs Reebok Nano X1

People tend to use the Nike Hyperlifts for wall balls, pistol squats, really anything that requires getting deep into the squat position.Keeping in mind that the Reebok Nano X1 is a very different training shoe compared to the previous Nanos, its performance reflected the new changes. The Reebok vector logo is subdued, and the main shoe feature standout is the plastic TPU heel clip which visually I’m not a fan of, although you may be. The heel drop from heel to the forefoot on both is 4mm, which is ideal for a training shoe. It gives a little elevation on the heel to assist with lifting, but not enough to make it feel unnatural or to hinder plyometric training.

The Nano X1 is 2 ounces lighter than its predecessor, has 7mm of drop (Up from 4), and best of all – has some effective cushion in the heel and midfoot. Quite frankly, the Nike shoe is probably tougher overall than the Nano X1. But that’s why it’s significantly heavier too.Across the board, there are no glaring major stability issues that I think could deter someone’s performance completely in the Nano X1 and Metcon 7. Conversely, if you do want absolute maximal stability when lifting from your cross-training shoes, then I’d suggest looking into the Nike Metcon 6 and Reebok Nano X. Due to it’s higher heel drop, and Floatride foam, I’d place it as less suitable for your heavy lifting CrossFit WOD or weightlifting barbell work, but highly suitable for your HIIT class, or any other gym workout. The design hallmark of the Metcon 6 (and the Metcon 5 before it) is that monster-sized rope wrap. That big rope wrap right at the midfoot is a prominent feature of the Metcon 6. It’s meant to provide grip (and friction protection) when climbing ropes.

Compared to other popular CrossFit shoes, such as the NoBull Trainers and Nike Metcons, the Reebok Nano X1s have much more cushioning. In my experience, the Nanos also have more forefoot flexibility and a toe box better suited to most people.The Nano X1s are constructed with the same Floatride Energy Foam that Reebok uses in running and HIIT shoes, while NoBulls and Metcons tend to feel much more flat. There are pros and cons to both types of shoes for use during CrossFit workouts. For instance, the Reebok Nano X1 Froning was developed with ‘Fittest Man in the World’ Rich Froning Jr., to create a high-performance CrossFit shoe with fore-foot straps and extra cushioning. Alternatively, if you’re looking for all the performance and comfort of the Nano but with an added touch of style, the Reebok Nano X1 Lux are a perfect blend of sports and leisure that you’ll want to wear even when you’re not working out. All of the X1 designs and colorways look like classic Reebok shoes, with a lot of the lines, contouring and curvature you can expect. They look super sporty. Reebok Nano X1 vs. Other CrossFit Shoes At times, the material at the bottom of the laces can bunch up in the regular Nano X1, an issue that isn’t really present in the Adventure and GRIT. Also, the tongue slides a bit on some occasions, which is another issue that was fixed in the Nano X1 Adventure. Insole Heel cup is rounded versus the straight heel cup on the Nano 9 and Nano X; keep this in mind if you prefer the heel design on the 9s and Xs.

If you’re squatting HEAVY we’d still recommend you go for a specific lifting shoe with a wooden sole and high heel to toe drop, but for 95% of athletes weightlifting in a gym, the Nano range will do the job. This is in pretty big contrast compared to the Reebok Nano X1 which has a consistent Floatride Energy Foam midsole throughout. On the heel, the Reebok Nano X1 does compress a tad more than the Metcon 7, but the difference is pretty minimal. Also to note on the fit, the toe box is wide, as with all Nano’s to give plenty of room for the toes to splay when lifting. The other big difference we get from the X1 is the cushion in the midsole (the part between your foot and the outsole.) There are A LOT of differences between the Reebok Nano X and the Reebok Nano X1. For starters, the Reebok Nano X has a 4mm heel-to-toe drop and the Reebok Nano X1 features a 7mm heel-to-toe drop. The Reebok Nano line has consistently been 4mm until this year, so the change in the Nano X1 was a fairly big deal.

It’s also a little bit helps when squatting, because it minimizes the ankle flexibility you need to get to depth. As previously stated, the Floatride Energy Foam provides brilliantly responsive cushioning, so these shoes are great for explosive jumping moves, plyometric exercises and hill sprints. You wouldn’t want to wear them for a marathon, but they’ll be great for a 5k.

Rebook Gym Shoes: Best Price U.K.

It offers noticeably better cushion in the heel and midfoot when running – even when compared to the Nike Metcon 6. What’s most interesting about both of these models is their new implementation of reworked midsole foams. Previously, the Nike Metcon 6 and below didn’t really feature much of an insole at all while the Reebok Nano models also featured minimal midsole constructions. In contrast the Nike Metcon 6 is heavier (but built like a tank) and it’s super versatile – thanks to the dual-density midsole and removable Hyperlifts – which let you choose 4mm or 12mm of drop. Another difference with each shoe and how they perform with versatile training is their overall sizing and fit. If you like having a bit more toe box room, then the Reebok Nano X1 will be a better shoe for you. If we look first at the new heel drop (+3mm versus all previous versions) this takes the Nano X1 much closer to the feel of a more traditional running shoe.